메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어학학회 영어학연구 영어학연구 제17권 제3호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
319 - 349 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper we examined how Korean learners of English process presumably semantic relationships by employing the event-related potentials (ERP) paradigm. The participants read simple sentences presented word-by-word and made plausibility judgments on three sentence types: no violation, thematic-role animacy violation, and non-thematic-role pragmatic violation. ERPs were measured at critical verbs that assign a thematic role of AGENT to their subject NPs, where the latter are integrated with the former. In the previous studies on L1 processing, thematic-role animacy violation elicited P600 effects as an index of syntactic/grammatical violation, whereas non-thematic-role pragmatic violation elicited N400 effects as an index of semantic/pragmatic violation. In this study on L2 processing, non-thematic-role pragmatic violation (For breakfast the boys would only bury...) elicited significant N400 effects. In thematic-role animacy violation (For breakfast the eggs would only eat...), however, there were no effects of N400 or P600. In short, unlike L1 speakers, Korean L2 learners have great difficulty in syntactic/grammatical processing. We suppose that this difficulty arises owing to the following factors. First, L2 learners tend to use semantic rather than syntactic information in sentence processing. Second, L1 is acquired implicitly in children, but L2 is learned explicitly in formal classrooms. Finally, with maturational changes, late L2 learners use a more declarative memory system than a procedural one in L2 syntactic/grammatical processing.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0