메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생성문법학회 생성문법연구 생성문법연구 제24권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
529 - 548 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper presents an analysis of asymmetries of long-distance A-dependencies between languages with agreement like English and languages without agreement like Korean. The observational fact is that A-dependencies occur long-distance, crossing over a finite clause in languages like Korean. This fact poses a problem for the conventional assumption that A-dependencies are clause-bounded. The issue is how to resolve the discrepancy in locality in the theory of grammar. I show that the apparent long-distance A-dependencies are made up of a set of successive cyclic local movement. My generalization is that A-dependencies take place long-distance regardless of finiteness of the clause in languages like Korean. This generalization is accounted for under the hypothesis that the subject is raised to Spec TP in agreement languages, while it is not in agreementless languages. The evidence is given by Korean. It is argued that in Korean, the thematic subject is not raised to Spec TP, and consequently Spec TP is available as an escape hatch for A-movement (Kim 2011). The difference in agreement results in the difference in the subject positions, which consequently bring about the difference in locality. The guiding idea of my analysis is that even though syntactic dependencies, whether A or A’, are unbounded, the core structural relations are fundamentally local. My analysis applies generally to all the typical A-dependency constructions; raising, passive, control, and anaphor binding. My analysis is subsumed under the Relativized Minimality (Rizzi 1990).

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0