지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this paper is to explore that the wanna-contraction is not a purely syntactic phenomenon but a phonological one.
Wanna-contraction in terms of a strict syntactic analysis should be reanalyzed in terms of its phonological process. However, it is true that syntactic movements and deletions might affect the location of the prosodic boundary. When want is followed by a moved element, the prosodic boundary comes in place of the moved element. Since want is lengthened with the prosodic boundary immediately following after,contraction is blocked. Wanna contraction is also blocked where there is some missing element immediately following after to. With the prosodic boundary in place of the deleted element, the duration of to is lengthened at a phrase-final or a sentence-final position, and no contraction will take place. Wanna contraction is by nature a phonological weakening or shortening of the function word to. It is sensitive to the lengthening of the syllables at the prosodic boundary and thus no more reducing arises when the function word is stressed or lengthened. I propose that the additional lengthening of want or to at the prosodic boundary may block the wanna contraction. This can be extended to explain all varieties of contractions. It should be also noted that wanna contraction is often found in rapid and causal speech. This also implies that there is no prosodic boundary between want and to when wanna contraction takes place.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (27)
참고문헌 신청
Bach, E. / 1982 / Purpose Clauses and Control. in The Nature of Syntactic Representation : 35 ~ 57
Baltin, M. R. / 1995 / Floating Quantifiers, PRO and Predication / Linguistic Inquiry 26 (2) : 199 ~ 248
Boas, H. C. / 2004 / You Wanna Consider a Constructional Approach toward Wanna-contraction? In Language, Culture and Mind / CSLI Publications : 479 ~ 491
Boecks, C. / 2000 / A Note on Contraction / Linguistic Inquiry 31 (2) : 357 ~ 366
Bolinger, D. / 1986 / Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English / Stanford University Press
Baltin, M. R. / 1995 / Floating Quantifiers, PRO and Predication / Linguistic Inquiry 26 (2) : 199 ~ 248
Boas, H. C. / 2004 / You Wanna Consider a Constructional Approach toward Wanna-contraction? In Language, Culture and Mind / CSLI Publications : 479 ~ 491
Boecks, C. / 2000 / A Note on Contraction / Linguistic Inquiry 31 (2) : 357 ~ 366
Bolinger, D. / 1986 / Intonation and Its Parts: Melody in Spoken English / Stanford University Press
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0