메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생성문법학회 생성문법연구 생성문법연구 제23권 제3호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
321 - 345 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Since Hong (1994) proposed the generalization that Korean case markers are optional only in the complement position, some counter-examples have been reported in which the so-called genitive case marker “uy”seems to be optional with possessor-like arguments and agent-like arguments in noun phrases. Further developing the argument of Bak,J.-S. (2003), we present in this paper some pieces of evidence that these counter-examples involve concrete or result nouns, which we claim take these types of arguments as complements, so that we can still maintain that Korean case markers are optional only in the complement position. However, we only use this generalization as a way to partially describe the distribution of “uy”; it is problematic in two respects: in this generalization “uy” is considered as a Case marker, and the fact that it appears obligatorily with adjunct noun phrases is not dealt with. We assume, following Hong (2010) and An (2012), that the so-called genitive case marker “uy” is not a case marker, but a modifier marker, because of the obligatory combination of “uy” and adjunct noun phrases, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, when noun phrases appear with “uy”they have the same distribution as relative clauses. We argue then that none of the noun phrases with “uy” is an argument, but that they are adjuncts, and that the only argument of a noun head is a noun phrase without the modifier marker “uy,” which occupies its complement position.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0