메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국알타이학회 알타이학보 알타이학보 제24호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
1 - 22 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The verbal suffix -du takes a flexible position in verbal predicate structuresaccording to the given verb form (i.e., finite/participle). There has beendisagreement regarding the grammatical function of the suffix -du thatprecedes the finite verb forms in previous work. Nikolaeva and Tolskaya(2001) claim that -du is used to mark the third person plural subject. Kazama (2007a, 2008a), on the other hand, rebuts this claim since theposition of -du is apparently different from the position of other personmarkers. Rather, Kazama claims that -du should be defined as a verbalderivational suffix, which is closely associated with plurality and directevidentiality. Furthermore, no specific study has been made on the suffix-du that follows the participle verb forms. Thus, this paper has reexaminedthe grammatical function of the verbal suffix -du, both in the finite andparticiple verbs, with reference to textual materials and elicitation data inUdihe. We conclude that the verbal suffix -du, in the finite verb, optionallyserves as the third person plural marker, since Udihe lost the Tungusicnominal plural suffix -l (which can indicate the third person plural in mostTungusic languages) in the process of phonetic change. The verbal suffix-du in the participle verb (present and past tense only) is used in the thirdperson plural, expressing direct evidentiality. The use of the verbal suffix-du in the participle may be another realization of the finite tense formsince they have evidentiality and syntactic function in common.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0