메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이중언어학회 이중언어학 이중언어학 제56호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
231 - 266 (36page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this study, we analyzed writing assessment self-efficacy of Korean language teachers and their evaluation characteristics. Our purpose was to collect information about raters and to gain a basic understanding of Korean writing assessment and training for raters. To do this, we split 39 Korean language teachers into three groups based on experience and asked them to complete a Korean writing assessment self-efficacy examination and to actually evaluate a composition. The results were then analyzed using FACETS, a statistics program which uses the “Many-facet Rasch Model” There was a noticeable difference between the group of teachers with less than two years of experience (A) and the two groups of teachers with more than two years of experience (B, C). There was a larger difference in “general writing assessment self-efficacy” than “practical writing assessment self-efficacy.” The three groups showed differences as to their strictness in using evaluation criteria. This creates a connection between writing assessment ability and writing assessment self-efficacy. The three groups also showed differences in suitable consistency. Teachers with more experience showed more suitable consistency. The group of teachers with less than two years of experience (A) showed over-fitted and mis-fitted consistency, causing a statistical difference in “general writing assessment self-efficacy.” Because writing assessment self-efficacy and assessment ability affect one another, there needs to be more training for Korean language teachers based on this type of writing assessment self-efficacy and evaluation characteristics.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0