메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 외국학연구소 외국학연구 외국학연구 제25호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
337 - 364 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This work is devoted to the opportunities and matters for the establishment of a new regionalism of Northeast Asia. At the end of the 20th century glocalization has emerged as a reaction against globalization. Glocalization is a compound phenomenon of globalization and localization in a country. As a result of glocalization various regional communities, such as the EU, NAFTA and ASEAN appeared. These organizations for regional supernational cooperation defend their own economic and regional interests and identities from various standards of global organizations like WTO, IMF and IDA. The region of Northeast Asia, however, has not yet built a regional collaborative system that provides political and economic stability to the members of the region(China, Japan, Russia and the Korean peninsula). This article analyzes the causes of the difficulties in establishing a regional collaborative system in Northeast Asia, where there are not only the most powerful economic and military force in the world, but also extremely valuable historical and cultural inheritance. The author supposes that the main cause of the past regional problems is associated with geopolitical and economic viewpoints on the region. The influence of the Cold War and the historical feud in this region gets inhibits mutual understanding and cooperation. The geopolitical and economic approaches to neighboring countries always relies on ethnocentrism. To establish a new order in this region, the author offers a cultural and dialogical approach to the knowledge of neighboring countries. For that, the author attempts to apply the following theories and concepts to the understanding of other countries: the theory of Contemporary English Culturalism, the ‘thick description’ concept of C. Geerts, and the dialogue theory of M. Bakhtin.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (33)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0