메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 외국학연구소 외국학연구 외국학연구 제25호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
249 - 270 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
An interest to the theater, which began from the 20th century’s Russian Symbolism, served as a momentum to explore the identity of the Russian drama theater. But the ideal of Symbolism caused, as an anti-these of it, Blok’s “pathos” in his drama 『Balaganchik』. By directing Blok’s 『Balaganchik』Meyerhold finds not only the theater technique as a type of theater but also forms of anti-reproduce plays against Stanislabski. The elements of farce in Block’s 『Balaganchik』 provided Meyerhold with a source of theatrical techniques. It includes the role of masks, which formalizes the figures, making the play unfixed in speech of actors and the structure of play-within-a-play, also the grotesque originated from a romantic irony. All of these theatrical techniques were the self-reflective type of theater, presupposing the theatrical conditions. The conditions of theater are not just a cause of failure of the Realism in theater but also the ‘keyword’ of Meyerhold’s theater. And it is a part of effort to establish ontological status of Art in the background of the 20th century’s Modernism. Meyerhold’s 『Balaganchik』 reveals the overall condition of the theater, and stimulates the imagination of the audience by metaphorically depicting an old structure of society. And the concept of the grotesque, as the result of these experiments, provides a blueprint of Meyerhold’s theater which was conducted forth by him.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0