지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
According to the 53th article of Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act of Korea, they can raise an objection to a disposition by Fair Trade Commission within 30 days from the day they are given the notice of a disposition, when they have a cause of objection. In other words, FTC takes charge of raising of an objection again that has been disposed first by FTC. In the case that they disagree with the second disposition of FTC, the affair is transferred to the exclusive jurisdiction of Seoul High Court. Therefore, a fair trade case is treated by not the third trial system. There has been a continuous criticism that the fairness cannot be guaranteed in this system.
However, Japanese Antitrust Law, which Korean Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act was modeled on, abolished the Claim System which corresponds to raising of an objection of Korea. And a revised bill, in which a fair trade case is handled base on the third trial system, was brought as a government legislation to the House of Representatives of Japan. This reflects that Japanese government accepts the opinions of the business community that has insisted that a case of fair trade should have a chance of the third trial system.
Thus, in Korea, raising of an objection system should be abolished and replaced by a new system bases on the third trial System that can give two chances of fact-finding proceedings to protect people’s right. By this, a case of fair trade should be handled more fairly and transparently.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0