메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소 교과교육학연구 교과교육학연구 제18권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
775 - 805 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study investigated whether different types of form-focused instruction, input-enhanced or output-enhanced, might be effective in improving low-proficiency learners' English knowledge about specific linguistic forms. The participants were 111 first-year Korean university students enrolled in an English conversation course. They were assigned to three groups; 35 students in the input-enhanced group (TIE), 33 in the output-enhanced group (DICT), and 45 in the control group (CG). English verb tenses and relative clauses were selected as the target structures. Pre- and post-tests were conducted to measure the effectiveness of different types of form-focused instruction on the acquisition of the target forms. Pre- and post-questionnaires were administered to examine the extent of the students' perceptions and attitudes towards the English instruction that they received. The study discovered that both input-enhanced and output-enhanced instruction were more effective than traditional grammar instruction in developing grammatical knowledge about verb tenses, while output-enhanced instruction was more effective than input-enhanced and traditional grammar instruction with respect to the learning of relative clauses. The results of the questionnaires indicated that learners who performed the TIE task and the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their perceptions about the English instruction that they received; only those in the dictogloss task showed positive changes in their attitudes towards the instruction. Based on the results, the limitations of the study and the pedagogical implications are provided.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0