이 연구는 고등학교 태권도 지도자의 리더십유형이 선수만족도 및 팀 효과성에 미치는 영향을규명하는데 그 목적이 있으며, 연구 대상은 2011년 전국 체전에 참가한 선수 400명을 모집단으로선정하여, 총 349명의 자료를 실제 분석에 사용하였다. 자료처리는 SPSS WIN 17.0을 이용하여,중다회귀분석(multiple regression analysis)을 사용하여 분석한 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 지도자리더십유형이 과제수행만족에 미치는 영향은 훈련과 지시행동, 권위적 행동 요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 사회적 상호작용만족에 미치는 영향은 훈련과 지시행동, 민주적 행동, 사회적 지지행동, 긍정적 보상행동 요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 지도자유형만족에 미치는 영향은 훈련과 지시행동, 민주적 행동, 사회적 지지행동 요인에서 긍정적 영향을미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 지도자 리더십유형이 동료만족에 미치는 영향은 훈련과 지시행동,민주적 행동 요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 팀 만족 및 몰입에 미치는 영향은훈련과 지시행동, 민주적 유형, 사회적 지지행동, 권위적 행동요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 팀 성과지각에 미치는 영향은 훈련과 지시행동, 민주적 유형, 사회적 지지행동, 긍정적 보상행동 요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 선수만족도가 동료만족에 미치는 영향은 과제수행만족, 사회적 상호작용만족, 지도자유형만족 요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는것으로 나타났으며, 팀 만족 및 몰입에 미치는 영향은 과제수행만족, 사회적 상호작용만족, 지도자유형만족 요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났고, 팀 성과지각에 미치는 영향은 과제수행만족, 사회적 상호작용만족, 지도자유형만족 요인에서 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
This study attempted to identify the effects of the leadership styles of high school Taekwondo coaches on player satisfaction and team effectiveness. In order to achieve the goals of this study, 400 players who participated in the National Sports Festival in 2011 were selected as a population, and the data were collected by using convenient sampling methods. The data on 349 participants were applied to real analysis. A questionnaire was used as a research tool,and SPSS WIN 17.0 was applied to process the data. The results from a multiple regression analysis are shown below.
First, based on the results of the effects of the leadership styles of coaches on player satisfaction, with regard to the effects of the leadership types of coaches on task performance satisfaction, positive effects were observed in training and directory and authoritarian behavioral factors. Considering the effects of the leadership types of coaches on social interaction satisfaction, there were positive effects in training and directory, and on democratic,social support, and positive compensation behavioral factors. With regard to the effects of the leadership styles of coaches on coach-type satisfaction, positive effects were observed in training and directory, and democratic and social support behavioral factors.
Second, based on the results of the effects of the leadership styles of coaches on team effectiveness and the effects of the leadership types of coaches on colleague satisfaction, positive effects were observed in training and directory, and democratic behavioral factors. With regard to the effects of the leadership types of coaches on team satisfaction and immersion, there were positive effects in training and directory, and democratic, social support, and authoritarian behavioral factors. With regard to the effects of the leadership styles of coaches on perceived performance, positive effects were observed in training and directory, and democratic, social support, and positive compensation behavioral factors.
Third, based on the results of the effects of player satisfaction on team effectiveness and with regard to the effects of player satisfaction on colleague satisfaction, positive effects were observed in task performance satisfaction, social interaction satisfaction, and the type of coach satisfaction factors. Considering the effects of player satisfaction on team satisfaction and immersion, there were positive effects in task performance satisfaction, social interaction satisfaction, and the type of coach satisfaction factors. With regard to the effects of player satisfaction on perceived performance, positive effects were observed in task performance satisfaction, social interaction satisfaction, and the type of coach satisfaction factors.