메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
이화여자대학교 교과교육연구소 교과교육학연구 교과교육학연구 제16권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
629 - 655 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study investigates the rating behavior of two native-speaking teachers and two Korean teachers of English when assessing forty essays written by Korean EFL students. Three research questions guided this study: (1) are there any similarities or differences in their rating behavior in holistic scoring? (2) Are there any similarities or differences in their rating behavior in analytic scoring? (3) And what factors are involved in these similarities or differences? Forty college students preparing for their TOEFL were asked to write an essay. Their essays were evaluated by the four teachers based on the TOEFL writing scoring rubric using the six point scale. The teachers read each essay twice. They were first required to give overall scores; then,in the second reading, they provided analytic assessments for four subareas. A paired t-test was performed to examine any discrepancy in holistic and analytic scoring between the two groups. Differences in holistic scoring appeared statistically significant: the Korean teachers gave higher scores than did their native counterparts. With respect to analytic scoring, the Korean raters also gave higher scores in all subareas, and the differences between the two groups were much greater than those in the holistic scoring. Interestingly, both groups gave the highest score in vocabulary, followed by grammar, content, and organization. A qualitative analysis indicated that all the teachers prioritized the logical flow of ideas and emphasized rhetorical features rather than linguistic features. Native teachers tended to score linguistic features based on native intuition. They also followed the Western writing convention in rating, while the Korean teachers applied the Korean rhetorical style.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0