메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제29권 제3호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
69 - 93 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The defining characteristic of the freedom of conscience in a democratic society is the freedom to have, hold and act upon(or not) one's conscientiously-held beliefs. It should be noted that an emphasis on individual conscience and individual judgement lies at the heart of a democratic political tradition. The ability of each citizen to make free and informed decisions is the absolute prerequisite for the legitimacy, acceptability, and efficacy of the system of self-government. Also, the rights associated with the freedom of individual conscience have much to do with human worth and dignity. The freedom of conscience is individual in its nature. In other words, it does not have a public component on it's own. Although it may inform debate on issues of the public good, but nothing more. The role it plays in a free nation is very essential, because it is the bases of various freedom in the Constitution, such as the freedom of religion, arts and sciences. It cannot be given or taken away. But whether any given activity is within an open-ended the freedom of conscience's guarantee, it must undergo a process of restriction. Through this process, its scope and content is constructed. In this Process, there are some individual criterions, such as the method and aim of the exercise of conscience and a administrative burden. I think that these criterions are an useful guideline when the judiciary deals with cases of the freedom of conscience.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0