지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The case law has recognized the statutory superficies on custom law in the event of different owners of a land and building due to forced sale by auction for the ownership of the building.
In order for the statutory superficies on custom law to constitute, first the owner of a land and building should be identical. In forced sale by auction, provisional seizure may have occurred before the decision to begin the forced sale. Such provisional seizure has an injunctive effect. Therefore, it should be viewed if the owner of land and the owner of building are the same person from the point of provisional seizure.
The Supreme Court 2012, 10, 18 Pronouncement 2010Da52140 Decision reviewed in this study, declared that such a foresaid provisional seizure should be the point of judgment.
In addition, the Supreme Court 2013, 4 11 Pronouncement 2009Da62059 Ruling stated that if a mortgage was established before seizure or provisional seizure, the mortgage point should be the baseline of judgment.
More work will be necessary to further standardize and objectify the requirement to constitute the statutory superficies on custom law.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (20)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0