지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research paper analyzes the Supreme Court decision(2008Da97218) delivered on September 16, 2010. The Court deals with the issue on how to view the legal effect of set-off by one of the pseudo joint-and-several liability debtors or debtors. The set-off expects fairness between neither with convenience of the settlement as a system to let a bond and the debt of the mutual interval become extinct with an equal sum and has a function of the security for the bond of the mutual interval. The reasons for decision are divided into the major opinion and minority opinion. The majority opinion ruled that, in the event that one of the pseudo joint-and-several liability debtors offset her claim against the creditor's claim, the debt-extinguishment effect by the set-off works on the other debtor(s) as well.
The Court reversed the Supreme Court rulings heretofore which had ruled that the set-off by one of the pseudo joint-and-several liability debtors has no effect whatsoever the other debtors. The Court judges that set-off can be regarded as the same means as repayment. The case should possibly be an important judicial precedent. And the new judgment mentioned above, therefore, can be understood to be of high precedent value in regulating the legal principle on the pseudo joint-and-several liability debtors.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0