메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제27권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
173 - 202 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Ostensibly, as European Union is not possessed of it own territory and people, it is difficult to say that the Union has the sovereignty of its own. Even though it is announced that European Union is possessed of sovereignty in Costa v. ENEL, the transfer of sovereignty declared on the case is just based on a limitation of sovereignty or a transfer of powers. Furthermore the transfer of sovereignty is possibile on the premise of the consent of Member States in European Union. Thus it should be noted that European Union is not possessed of its own initiative in proceeding the integration of European Union. Of course European Union is to be evaluated as the sui generis entity on the ground that it obtains various characteristics in integration such as its own legal order, de facto power of separation, the system of judicial review and the concept of Citizenship etc. Nonetheless European Union has a great deal of difficulties in its own integration considering the opinion of German federal constitutional court(Budesverfassungsgerichtbarkeit) that the Member States are the authentic Masters of Treaties(Herren der Verträge) rather that the European Union. In spite of these difficulties in integration, European Union has not forsaken the purpose and willingness for integration especially considering its trial for the Treaty for European Union establishing Constitution. Even though the trial was failed, European Union has not still abandoned the purpose and willingness for integration with a focus of the power of European Parliament. In other words European Union has reinforced the power(legislative power) of European Parliament from its outset. And European Union has tried to enhance the power of European Parliament at Lisbon Treaty such as co-decision procedure(TFEU Article 289, Article 294), election of the President of the Commission(Article 17), the power of regulation(Article 290) and the power of budget(TFEU Article 314) etc. Taking into consideration of those aspects concerning the power of European Parliament, it is postulated that European Union tried to reinforce its own democratic legitimacy. Thus we can conclude that European Union has managed to overcome its democratic deficit and to secure its position for integration by reinforcing the power and status of European Parliament.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0