메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제28권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
201 - 226 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We have a criminal investigative procedural code that is made and maintained for evidences based on physical attributes. However, we have recognized that evidences in cyber space have different attributes and characteristics than those in physical search and seize procedures. Fortunately, digital evidence accepted as evidence in the amended law that was effective January 1, 2012. However, our society is becoming more ubiquitous again. Therefore, it is not enough to add digital evidence as evidence but also to change the procedural code of search and seizure for digital evidence. A new set of search and seizure procedures should be developed that provides for efficiency investigation while ensuring that privacy rights are protected for the subjects and 3rd parties involved. In this study, we reviewed types of evidence collection in cyberspace and classified them by objective point of view and pitted them against the current law. The research suggested a new proper form of the method of seizure and search for evidences in the cyber environment. Furthermore, it was paramount consider the dual perspective to guarantee human rights. Also, there needs to be a data preservation system, command procedure for seizure, seizure and search system over networks, and collection system of communications for effective investigation. Finally, a regulation is required to ensure cooperation of information and service providers with law enforcement agencies. In establishing a legal system for cyber forensics, there should be a system for cyber criminal investigative procedural code in this ubiquitous era.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0