메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제30권 제1호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
223 - 245 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The European Court of Human Rights can be said to be a globally unique court of law, which makes judicial decision on basic rights of being secured in the European Convention on Human Rights. The huge activity in the European Court of Human Rights has jurisdiction over Human Rights Abuse lawsuit that 800 million people received from a country when it comes to population in the whole area of Europe. However, it is a point of being a law-court of handling fundamental rights, which has extensive jurisdiction, given analyzing the most important characteristic in the European Court of Human Rights from the legal perspective. Also, it is a court of justice pertinent to fundamental rights based on international law called the European Convention on Human Rights. However, what enforced the convention with the procedure as saying of making judgment of having legal binding force by which the European Court of Human Rights has a trial of a problem about human rights abuse raised by an individual is from after when No. 11 Protocol took effect in 1998 given examining it objectively. This study aims to analyze the current system and the old system after broadly viewing convention execution system. And, the aim is to mention focusing on a decision case in the Court of Human Rights after discussing and surveying about the nature as the domestic law on the convention of human rights, which becomes a problem in Germany, and about the effect as the domestic law on judgment in the European Court of Human Rights.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0