녹갈색 경관의 생태학  : 도시환경에서의 야생지 개념 및 자연문학 장르 재고

신두호

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 신두호

저널정보: 서울대학교 미국학연구소 미국학 미국학 제32권 제2호

발행연도: 2009.1

수록면: 81 - 120 (40page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Deep ecological perspectives have predominantly characterized the development of ecocriticism from its incipiency in the early 1990s, and, consequently, ecocriticism has been incapacitated in its analysis of the urban environments. Instead it has given a preference for pristine wilderness as a thematic subject and nature writing of wilderness as a defining genre. Being confronted with ever worsening environmental degradations on our own home grounds and facing the ensuing challenges within and without to the narrowness of such subject matters and genres, ecocriticism has grafted perspectives of social ecology whose central tenets can be described as a set of beliefs that integrates the study of human and natural ecosystems through understanding the interrelationships of culture and nature. This distaff branch of ecocriticism that is grounded on social ecology pays attention to human environments, especially the urban environments. This shift toward social ecocriticism, which has become a prominent tendency in the post-2000 ecocriticism school, has brought about two consequences: a change of concept of nature and wilderness, on the one hand, and a change of the status of nature writing, on the other. Nature is now understood as human landscape and environment rather than pristine wilderness whereas wilderness as neglected, unattended, violence-rampant urban ghettos and the people residing there. With wilderness fetishism waning as a result of the graft of sociological perspectives, ecocriticism's feverish interest in nature writing has been decreased and fiction genre instead has gained much attention by social ecocritical study. Ecocriticism’s sociological perspectives on the urban nature and environments as such, however, entail some problems that should not be left unnoticed. First, by foregrounding pending problems of urban environmental destructions and relevant social inequalities, ecocriticism pays little attention to physical nature and wilderness (in a traditional sense) which can be found in urban environment and our home backyard as well as in pristine wilderness areas. Appreciation of beauty and value of such nature existence is still important for city dwellers in fostering ecological and environmental consciousness. Second, the presupposition of social ecocriticism that nature writing deals with pristine wilderness only, and that thus it is not a proper genre for the subjects of the urban environment matters results in the negligence of paying attention to urban nature writing. Contemporary urban nature writers such as Charles Siebert, Lisa Couturier, Michael Rockland demonstrate that nature, or wilderness can also be found in our urban environments, and that modified and harmed nature of urban environment as well can or should be a proper subject to nature writing genre.

Deep ecological perspectives have predominantly characterized the development of ecocriticism from its incipiency in the early 1990s, and, consequently, ecocriticism has been incapacitated in its analysis of the urban environments. Instead it has given a preference for pristine wilderness as a thematic subject and nature writing of wilderness as a defining genre. Being confronted with ever worsening environmental degradations on our own home grounds and facing the ensuing challenges within and without to the narrowness of such subject matters and genres, ecocriticism has grafted perspectives of social ecology whose central tenets can be described as a set of beliefs that integrates the study of human and natural ecosystems through understanding the interrelationships of culture and nature. This distaff branch of ecocriticism that is grounded on social ecology pays attention to human environments, especially the urban environments. This shift toward social ecocriticism, which has become a prominent tendency in the post-2000 ecocriticism school, has brought about two consequences: a change of concept of nature and wilderness, on the one hand, and a change of the status of nature writing, on the other. Nature is now understood as human landscape and environment rather than pristine wilderness whereas wilderness as neglected, unattended, violence-rampant urban ghettos and the people residing there. With wilderness fetishism waning as a result of the graft of sociological perspectives, ecocriticism's feverish interest in nature writing has been decreased and fiction genre instead has gained much attention by social ecocritical study. Ecocriticism’s sociological perspectives on the urban nature and environments as such, however, entail some problems that should not be left unnoticed. First, by foregrounding pending problems of urban environmental destructions and relevant social inequalities, ecocriticism pays little attention to physical nature and wilderness (in a traditional sense) which can be found in urban environment and our home backyard as well as in pristine wilderness areas. Appreciation of beauty and value of such nature existence is still important for city dwellers in fostering ecological and environmental consciousness. Second, the presupposition of social ecocriticism that nature writing deals with pristine wilderness only, and that thus it is not a proper genre for the subjects of the urban environment matters results in the negligence of paying attention to urban nature writing. Contemporary urban nature writers such as Charles Siebert, Lisa Couturier, Michael Rockland demonstrate that nature, or wilderness can also be found in our urban environments, and that modified and harmed nature of urban environment as well can or should be a proper subject to nature writing genre.

#도시자연문학 #야생자연 #사회생태비평 #갈색경관 #찰스 시버트 #리사 코투리어 #마이클 로크랜드 #urban nature writing #wilderness #social ecocriticism #brown landscape #Charles Siebert #Lisa Couturier #Michel Rockland

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

/ / Couturier, Lisa. Interview. “Listening for the Hopes of Snakes: A Celebration of Urban Wildlife.” Satya (August 2005)

Armbruster, Karla / 2001 / Beyond Nature Writing: Expanding the Boundaries of Ecocriticism / U of Virginia P

Bennett, Michael / 1999 / The Nature of Cities: Ecocriticism and Urban Environments / U of Arizona P

Bennett, Michael / 2003 / From Wide Open Spaces to Metropolitan Places: The Urban Challenge to Ecocriticism in : The ISLE Reader: The Ecocriticism, 1993-2003 / U of Georgia P : 296 ~ 317

Birkert, Sven / 1996 / Only God Can Make a Tree: The Joys and Sorrows of Ecocriticism / The Boston Book Review 3 (1) : 6 ~

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

신두호

소속기관 서울대학교 미국학연구소

주요연구분야 복합학 > 학제간연구

논문수 1 이용수 4

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (30)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)