메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국국방연구원 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 제26권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
333 - 349 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Why did the George W. Bush Administration change its policy toward NorthKorea from confrontation to accommodation during the second nuclear crisis?This article answers the question by analyzing how and why a coalition—includingBush Administration doves, China, Russia, South Korea and, at times, Japan andNorth Korea—worked together to overcome the reticence of Bush Administrationhawks to engage with Pyongyang. Building on the soft balancing, bureaucraticpolitics, and transgovernmental coalitions literature, this article explains how theSix-Party Talks served this coalition to understand the extent to which theyshared goals and policies. Aware of the divisions within the Bush Administrationregarding policy toward North Korea, the five other parties to the talks were ableto undermine the preferred policies of U.S. hawks while supporting the policiesof doves. Thus, rather than determining Washington’s behavior, this coalition laid theground for U.S. officials supportive of accommodation to upload their preferencesinto official Bush Administration’s policy. This article therefore also sheds light onhow soft balancing can be used by third parties to influence the decision-makingprocess in the United States.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0