메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국18세기영문학회 18세기영문학 18세기영문학 제9권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
1 - 28 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Marino Faliero, one of Byron’s historical dramas, has drawn controversy over his political tendency. Some critics claim that he was politically conservative in this drama, whereas others argue otherwise. The first group of critics tends to think that this drama was written for stage because they believe Byron used it to preach conservative messages to the audience. My argument, however, is that he wrote it for the closet because it would enable him to express his radical ideas freely without catering to the audience. As a committee member of Theater Drury Lane, Byron was aware of what elements a play should contain to be successful at the theater. He stated that it was written for the closet, and thus it did not contain the elements that were necessary for success on stage. Nevertheless, the critics do not accept his statement as it is. Faliero plays the role of a Byronic hero who rebelled against the existing aristocracy but the critics fail to find Byronic heroes in historical dramas as they did in poetic dramas. Although Faliero’s rebellion failed in this drama, Byron’s political ideas are reflected in his frequent statements supporting for freedom and justice in his society.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0