지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.1
- 수록면
- 125 - 155 (31page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As the number of International Bilateral Treaties and Free Trade Agreements increases, the Investor-State Arbitration has now grown in importance. Procedural reformation of international arbitration is critical to enhance coherence and consistency of the arbitrational decision. ICSID investor-state arbitration is unique in its system because of its mixed nature of international commercial arbitration and public law realms. Discussion about adopting an appellate system in the international arbitration system seems to be a meaningful option even though it seems to be an controverted idea to introduce ad hoc arbitration system. The 2002 US Trade Promotion Authority Act and the 2004 ICSID working paper commonly considered adopting an appellate body in the international dispute settlement regime. WTO Appellate Body can be a desirable model for ICSID. Adopting an appellate system in ICSID can establish more coherent and consistent arbitration tribunal in the long term perspective. Enhancing transparency in ICSID tribunal is another measure to further develop the arbitration system. The cases in the NAFTA regime such as Methanex case show that public participation and the use of amicus briefs are useful tools to improve transparency. Enhanced transparency in the investor-state arbitration system will ultimately lead to better arbitration rules. Procedural reform measures in international arbitration are important tools to create more consistent and legitimate international arbitration.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0