지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.1
- 수록면
- 3 - 35 (33page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper examines what discussed and suggested concerning the competition of provisional attachment and injunction about the right to registration of ownership transfer.
Precedents adopted theory by according to priority of execution in the competition of provisional attachment and injunction about real estate. But, Precedents adopted theory of provisional attachment priority in the competition of provisional attachment and injunction about the right to registration of ownership transfer. These attitudes of precedents are not convincing.
Scholars and Judges are much discussed that the problems of competition to provisional attachment and injunction about the right to registration of ownership transfer. The first opinion is theory of provisional attachment priority. This theory claims that Civil Execution Act was given a stand alone collection right to provisional attachment. But, Injunction was not given a stand alone collection right, only has legal position of general creditor. Therefore, Injunction creditors are only protected by Obligee's Right of Subrogation to the Obligor as general creditors. The second opinion is theory of execution priority. This theory claims that Civil Law and Civil Execution Act allow not method of public announcement about the right to registration of ownership transfer. In the end, Courts have to decide the ranking of provisional attachment and injunction through Civil Law §450. I insists theory of execution priority. The reasons, Injunction creditors keeps ahead of provisional attachment creditors in the real estate contract.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (19)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0