지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is analyze application of the bank-to-bank reimbursement in the documentary credit transactions. Bank-to-bank reimbursement transaction may be ruled under URR725 and UCP600 article 13.
A bank which pays out money at the instruction of another bank is entitled to claim reimbursement. Even in a simple money transfer, the issuer of the instruction is under a duty to reimburse the bank instructed by him. When the bank which is instructed to make payment carries out its instruction, a reimbursement right accrues to it. Issues respecting reimbursement through a third party bank arise regularly in letter of credit transactions, for instance, where a negotiating bank is requested to reimburse itself by drawing on the issuing bank's account with the reimbursing bank. But the type of arrangement discussed is not confined to letter of credit transactions. A claiming bank may be authorized to draw on a reimbursing bank in respect of financing packages, such as substantial deals respecting goods, equities or securities.
Thought this study, it makes possible for concerned parties of documentary credits to establish desirable practices in international payment system in relation to bank-to-bank reimbursement.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (17)
참고문헌 신청
/ / Chitty on Contracts (29th edn, Sweet & Maxwell, London), §§160 etseq
/ 1872 / Overend & Gurney Co. v Gibb (1872) L.R. 5 H.L. 480
/ 1955 / Midland Bank v Seymour [1955] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 147
/ 1983 / European Asian Bank AG v Punjab and Sind Bank (No. 2) [1983] 1 W.L.R. 642
/ 1983 / JuniorBooksLtd v. VeitchiCo.Ltd [1983]1A.C.520
/ 1872 / Overend & Gurney Co. v Gibb (1872) L.R. 5 H.L. 480
/ 1955 / Midland Bank v Seymour [1955] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 147
/ 1983 / European Asian Bank AG v Punjab and Sind Bank (No. 2) [1983] 1 W.L.R. 642
/ 1983 / JuniorBooksLtd v. VeitchiCo.Ltd [1983]1A.C.520
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0