지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Even where a letter of credit is expressed to be transferable, it does not follow that the first beneficiary is entitled to require that the credit be transferred. Banks do not regard themselves as being obligated to effect a transfer. UCP 600 stipulates that even the issuing bank or the confirming bank is under no obligation to transfer a credit except to the extent and in the manner expressly consented to by that bank. However, U.C.C. does not permit the issuing bank or the confirming bank to arbitrarily refuse a request to transfer. The Chinese court ruled that where a transferring bank effects a transfer but omits a required documents, it faces liability if the omission causes failure to present a document that is the basis for the issuing bank to refuse the presentation.
Therefore, the transferring bank should be careful not to advise the original credit otherwise. The transferring bank should also check whether the second beneficiary who is abroad is the party subject to sanction or not.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
/ / www.dcprofessional.com
/ / www.westlaw.com
Byrne, James E. / 2007 / The Comparison of UCP600 & UCP500 / The Institute of International Banking Law & Practice, Inc
Byrne, James E. / 2010 / UCP600: An Analytical Commentary / The Institute of International Banking Law & Practice, Inc
Byrne, James E. / 2011 / International Letter of Credit Law and Practice / WEST
/ / www.westlaw.com
Byrne, James E. / 2007 / The Comparison of UCP600 & UCP500 / The Institute of International Banking Law & Practice, Inc
Byrne, James E. / 2010 / UCP600: An Analytical Commentary / The Institute of International Banking Law & Practice, Inc
Byrne, James E. / 2011 / International Letter of Credit Law and Practice / WEST
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0