메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국자료분석학회 Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society Journal of The Korean Data Analysis Society 제15권 제1호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
63 - 76 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study criticizes the variance decomposition of stock returns yielded by the residual approach. In the residual approach, the dividend growth component is obtained as the residual after the future return component is estimated. This residual approach has two drawbacks. First, it is prone to understate the contribution of dividend growth component if dividend growth rates and discount rates move together. The second problem arises when stock price has a nonlinear relation with dividend. This paper compares the residual approach with the direct approach in which the dividend growth component is estimated directly from the dynamics of dividend. The results are as follows: In the direct approach, the variability in stock return is explained mostly by the dividend growth component. In the residual approach, however, a fraction of future returns can be forecast by the dividend-price ratio, and sometimes a large contribution is assigned to the future return component. When we perform a variance decomposition using the simulation method, we find that the residual approach has a tendency to overstate the contribution of future return component and understate the contribution of dividend growth component as compared to the direct approach.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0