메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국예이츠학회 한국 예이츠 저널 한국 예이츠 저널 제44권
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
15 - 30 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
As a young poet, Yeats believed that individual imagination was the paramount source of inspiration. His Romantic convictions were reinforced by Arthur Hallam’s claim that “pure” poetry came from the “impression on the senses of certain very sensitive men.” But he quickly recognized that a focus on the self might lead to solipsism. As an Irish Nationalist, too, he increasingly wanted his writing to engage directly with the world. Anxieties about where inspiration comes from, and whether art is merely autotelic, intensified in his work of the later 1890s, and led him to propose that genuine creativity required transcending the egotistical by accessing “universal thought.” He refined this proposition in his theorizations of the Mask and in A Vision, generating a neo-Romantic conception of selfhood as mobile, porous and shaped by the artist-mage’s powers. T. S. Eliot famously conceived of poetry as “not the expression of personality, but an escape from personality.” Yeats’s later formulations of poetic inspiration resolved the key tensions that had troubled him by acknowledging the artist as necessarily both finger and clay. In this early embrace of a Modernist notion of unstable, multiple selfhood, Yeats paradoxically became more fully a Romantic.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0