메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives:Epistaxis is a frequently seen disease in the field of otorhinolaryngology. However, many patients have to revisit the hospital because of the failure of the initial treatment, in which cases, the inconvenience is greater due to more severe bleeding. We studied epistaxis patients who visited our service during the last 10 years to analyze the causes of visits and the possible countermeasures. Subjects and Method:We studied retrospectively the clinical cases of 616 emmergency patients and 65 patients admitted for the treatment of epistaxis during the last 10 years, from August 1995 to July 2004. The group I, 505 patients (74.2%), improved with only one treatment. The group II, 176 patients (25.8%), showed refractory epistaxis following the initial treatment. Results:In the group I, Kisselbach’s area (68.1%) was the most common site to be treated, followed by Woodruff’s area (13.5%), anterior end of inferior turbinate (8.3%), and superior portion of septum (2.0%). In the group II, the most frequent area to be treated was Woodruff’s area (46.0%), followed by Kisselbach’s area (31.8%), superior portion of septum (4.6%), anterior end of inferior turbinate (4.0%). Conclusion:The most important factor in the failure of primary care was because the precise area of bleeding was not found at the time of initial treatment. Therefore, it is important that we must check the areas by endoscope carefully to decrease the failure of initial treatment of epistaxis.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (12)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0