A Systematic Review of Benefit of Silicone Intubation in Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy

강민규; 심우섭; 신동근; 김주연; 이지은; 정한진

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 강민규 심우섭 신동근 김주연 이지은 정한진

저널정보: 대한이비인후과학회 Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 제11권 제2호

발행연도: 2018.1

수록면: 81 - 88 (8page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Objectives. Insertion of a silicone stent during endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is the most common procedure to prevent rhinostomy closure. It has been claimed that silicone intubation improves the surgical outcomes of endoscopic DCR. However, many reports have documented an equally high success rate for surgery without silicone intubation. Accordingly, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the outcomes of endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation and determine whether silicone intubation is actually beneficial for patients. Methods. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify relevant controlled trials evaluating endoscopic DCR with and without silicone intubation. The search was restricted to English articles published between January 2007 and December 2016. Relevant articles were reviewed to obtain information pertaining to interventions and outcomes. We also performed a meta-analysis of the relevant literature. Results. In total, 1,216 patients included in 12 randomized controlled trials were pooled. A total of 1,239 endoscopic DCR procedures were performed, and silicone stents were used in 533 procedures. The overall success rate for endoscopic DCR was 91.9% (1,139/1,239), while the success rates with and without silicone intubation were 92.9% (495/533) and 91.2% (644/706), respectively. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity among the included studies. A meta-analysis using a fixed-effects models showed no significant difference in the success rate between endoscopic DCR with silicone intubation and that without silicone intubation (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.89 to 2.12; P=0.148; z= 1.45). Furthermore, there were no significant differences with regard to surgical complications such as synechia, granulation, and postoperative bleeding. Conclusion. The findings of our meta-analysis suggest that the success rate and postoperative complication rate for endoscopic DCR is not influenced by the use of silicone intubation during the procedure.

참고문헌 (47)

참고문헌 신청

Unlu HH / 2002 / Comparison of surgical outcomes in primary endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation / Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 111(8):704~709

Leong SC / 2010 / A systematic review of outcomes after dacryocystorhinostomy in adults / Am J Rhinol Allergy 24(1):81~90

Feng YF / 2011 / A meta-analysis of primary dacryocystorhinostomy with and without silicone intubation / Can J Ophthalmol 46(6):521~527

Callejas CA / 2010 / Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with selective stenting / Laryngoscope 120(7):1449~1452

Syed MI / 2013 / Endoscopic primary dacryocystorhinostomy: are silicone tubes needed? Our experience in sixty three patients / Clin Otolaryngol 38(5):406~410

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!