메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
PurposeThis study was conducted in order to determine the most cost-effective strategy, interms of interval and age range, for liver cancer screening in the high-risk populationof Korea. Materials and MethodsA stochastic model was used to simulate the cost-effectiveness of liver cancer screeningby combined ultrasonography and alpha-fetoprotein testing when varying bothscreening intervals and age ranges. The effectiveness of these screening strategiesin the high-risk population was defined as the probability of detecting preclinical livercancer, and cost was based on the direct cost of the screening and confirmative tests. Optimal cost-effectiveness was determined using the incremental cost-effectivenessratio. ResultsAmong the 36 alternative strategies, one-year or two-year interval screening for menaged between 50 and 80 years, six-month or one-year interval screening for menaged between 40 and 80 years, and six-month interval screening for men agedbetween 30 and 80 years were identified as non-dominated strategies. For women,identified non-dominated strategies were: one-year interval screening between age50 and 65 years, one-year or six-month interval screening between age 50 and 80years, six-month interval screening between age 40 and 80 years, and six-monthinterval screening between age 30 and 80 years. ConclusionIn Korea, a one-year screening interval for men aged 50 to 80 years would bemarginally cost-effective. Further studies should be conducted in order to evaluateeffectiveness of liver cancer screening, and compare the cost effectiveness of differentliver cancer screening programs with a final outcome indicator such as qualityadjustedlife-years or disability-adjusted life-years.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0