메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한감염학회 Infection and Chemotherapy Infection and Chemotherapy 제46권 제4호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
219 - 225 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Although antibiotics whose epithelial lining fluid (ELF) concentrations are reported high tend to be preferred in treatment ofpneumonia, measurement of ELF concentrations of antibiotics could be misled by contamination from lysis of ELF cells andtechnical errors of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). In this review, ELF concentrations of anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcusaureus (MRSA) antibiotics were interpreted considering above confounding factors. An equation used to explain antibiotic diffusioninto CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) was adopted: ELF/free serum concentration ratio = 0.96 + 0.091 × ln (partition coefficient/ molecular weight1/2). Seven anti-MRSA antibiotics with reported ELF concentrations were fitted to this equation to see if theirELF concentrations were explainable by the penetration capacity only. Then, outliers were modeled under the assumption ofvarying contamination from lysed ELF cells (test range 0-10% of ELF volume). ELF concentrations of oritavancin, telavancin,tigecycline, and vancomycin were well described by the diffusion equation, with or without additional impact from cell lysis. For modestly high ELF/free serum concentration ratio of linezolid, technical errors of BAL should be excluded. Although teicoplaninand iclaprim showed high ELF/free serum ratios also, their protein binding levels need to be cleared for proper interpretation. At the moment, it appears very premature to use ELF concentrations of anti-MRSA antibiotics as a relevant guide fortreatment of lung infections by MRSA.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0