메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한가정의학회 Korean Journal of Family Medicine Korean Journal of Family Medicine 제33권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
89 - 93 (5page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: In reporting results of case-control studies, odds ratios are useful methods of reporting fi ndings. However,odds ratios are often misinterpreted in the literature and by general readers. Methods: We searched all original articles which were published in the Korean Journal of Family Medicine from 1980 to May 2011and identifi ed those that report "odds ratios." Misinterpretation of odds ratios as relative risks has been identifi ed. Estimated risk ratios were calculated when possible and compared with odds ratios. Results: One hundred and twenty-eight articles using odds ratios were identifi ed. Among those, 122 articles were analyzed for the frequency of misinterpretation of odds ratios as relative risks. Twenty-two reports out of these 122 articles misinterpreted odds ratios as relative risks. Th e percentage of misinterpreting reports decreased over years. Seventy-seven reports were analyzed to compare the estimated risk ratios with odds ratios. In most of these articles, odds ratios were greater than estimated risk ratios,60% of which had larger than 20% standardized diff erences. Conclusion: In reports published in the Korean Journal of Family Medicine, odds ratios are frequently used. They were misinterpreted in part of the reports, although decreasing trends over years were observed.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0