지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper has discussed Kim Wook Dong’s argument of ‘Hunminjeongeum Eonhae is intra-lingual translation’ (2010: 261-270). The author considers it in the negative sense. The reason is as follows:The source language of Eonhae is Chinese characters and its target language is Korean. And the intra-lingual translation occurs when SL and TL are identical. Therefore, if Eonhae is to be an intra-lingual translation, the SL or Chinese characters and the TL or the Korean should be the same. The Kim’s false argument originates from his confusion of language style and language itself. In other words, Kim (2010) believes that there existed a language with two varieties in the late middle Korean. The co-existence of language styles cannot automatically guarantee that the two should belong to a same language. The written Chinese is still a foreign language which originally represents the spoken Chinese, and it cannot be the same language as Korean.
In its final analysis Kim’s argument of ‘Hunminjeongeum Eonhae or Eonhae is intra-lingual translation’ (2010: 261-270) has been based on insufficient evidence, and it should be revised as ‘Hunminjeongeum Eonhae or Eonhae is inter-lingual translation.’
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (15)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0