메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국정신분석학회 정신분석 정신분석 제24권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
102 - 110 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder (DSM) is the most widely used diagnosis classification system in mental health area. DSM-5 personality disorder work group developed a brand new classification system remarkably changed from DSM-IV-TR system. But American Psychiatric Association board committee turned down and it could not be included in DSM-5. However it contained numerous radical changes especially reintroducing psychoanalytic concepts. It would be meaningful to explore the proposed new definition of personality disorders and classifications. DSM-5 proposal defined personality disorder as dysfunction in ‘self’ and ‘interpersonal’. The concept of self and interpersonal resembled psychoanalytic ‘ego and self integration’and ‘object representation’. DSM-5 personality disorder proposal presented ‘severity’ rating, and it was similar with the level system proposed by Gunderson in ‘Borderline personality disorder’. Remaining 6 personality disorders in DSM-5 proposal were antisocial, borderline, narcissistic, avoidant, schizotypal and obsessive-compulsive. The known treatment of choice for most of them was psychotherapy, which implied that psychoanalytic concepts might be the core theoretical and clinical methods to evaluate and treat personality disorder patients. It is true that psychoanalysis has been isolated from main psychiatric field because of few evidence based medical knowledge or scientific research results. The new proposed DSM-5 personality disorders showed that psychoanalytic theory and concepts could have sufficient power to be the central core of personality disorder.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (27)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0