메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background: Thrombolysis becomes an emerging therapeutic option for acute ischemic stroke. However, few reports exist on its use in the very elderly. We investigated whether there is a difference in the effectiveness and safety of intravenous (IV) and/or intra-arterial (IA) thrombolysis between patients aged ≥80 years and those aged <80 years. Methods: A consecutive series of patients hospitalized within 12 hours from stroke onset were selected. We evaluated the effectiveness of thrombolysis with modifi ed Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months, and the safety with symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation (sHT). The odds ratio (OR)of thrombolysis on the favorable mRS (0-2) was calculated using multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustments for potential confounders. Whether the effectiveness of thrombolysis is age-dependent or not was analyzed by introducing an interaction term (thrombolysis×age group) into multivariable models. Results: Among 219 patients ≥80 years, 21% of patients received IV or IA or combined thrombolysis while 23% of 980 patients <80 years received thrombolysis (P =0.51). With respect to the favorable mRS, the adjusted ORs of thrombolysis were 1.70 (95% confi dence interval, 1.08-2.68) in all subjects, 1.61(0.58-4.49) in those ≥80 years, and 1.71 (1.05-2.78) in those <80 years. There was no signifi cant interaction between age group and thrombolysis (P =0.91). With respect to sHT, the adjusted OR was 4.72 (1.94-11.45) in all subjects with no signifi cant interaction (P =0.86). Conclusion: This study suggests that thrombolysis may be equally safe and effective in stroke patients aged ≥80 years versus <80 years.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0