메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한고관절학회 Hip and Pelvis Hip and Pelvis 제26권 제4호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
235 - 242 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Deep infection after hip and knee arthroplasty is a serious complication and is difficult to treat due toits toxicity. The aims of our study were to find out the differences of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection after hip and knee arthroplastyfocusing on clinical course and laboratory findings. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 61 staphylococcal infection cases after hip and kneearthroplasty (MSSA in 25 patients, MRSA in 36 patients). Vital signs, laboratory tests, microbiology and clinicalcourses were analyzed. The average follow-up period was 3.8 years (range, 2 to 10.1 years). Results: At initial visit, MRSA group showed significant higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein(CRP) and neutrophil percentage. The average duration for the normalization of CRP was longer in MRSA group(MRSA: 36.7±25.1 days, MSSA: 24.7±13.6 days; P=0.008). The mean interval between staging operation waslonger in MRSA group (MRSA: mean 8.7 weeks [range, 6.4 to 21.4 weeks], MSSA: mean 6.8 weeks [range, 6 to13.1 weeks]; P=0.012). MRSA group (13.9%) revealed higher recurrence rate than MSSA group (4%). Two patients(5.6%) from MRSA group expired by sepsis. One limb amputation (2.7%) was carried out in MRSA group. Conclusion: MRSA infection after arthroplasty showed more toxic serologic parameter and poorer prognosis. Aggressive treatment should be considered for MRSA infection following arthroplasty.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0