메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
거트앤리버 발행위원회 Gut and Liver Gut and Liver 제8권 제5호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
519 - 525 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims: This study aimed to compare the outcomesof endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) andgastrectomy based on the two sets of indications for ESD,namely guideline criteria (GC) and expanded criteria (EC). Methods: Between January 2004 and July 2007, 213 earlygastric cancer (EGC) patients were enrolled in this study. Of these patients, 142 underwent ESD, and 71 underwentgastrectomy. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of thesepatients according to the criteria. Results: The complicationrates in the ESD and gastrectomy groups were 8.5% and28.2%, respectively. The duration of hospital stay was significantlyshorter in the ESD group than the gastrectomy groupaccording to the GC and EC (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). There was no recurrence in the ESD and gastrectomygroups according to the GC, and the recurrence rates in theESD and gastrectomy groups were 4.7% and 0.0% accordingto the EC, respectively (p=0.279). The occurrence rates ofmetachronous cancer in the ESD and gastrectomy groupswere 5.7% and 5.0% according to the GC (p=1.000) and7.5% and 0.0% according to the EC (p=0.055), respectively. Conclusions: Based on safety, duration of hospital stay, andlong-term outcomes, ESD may be an effective and safe firstlinetreatment for EGC according to the EC and GC.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0