메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국민족연구원 민족연구 민족연구 제46호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
127 - 144 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Bush administration has consistently framed its foreign policy in religious language, following the September 11 attack. It is understood that in practical terms, the separation of politics and religion is not categorically applied in the U.S. In that context, we examine how American religion has related to neoconservative foreign policy attitudes. Separation between church and state does not mean that religious views should be excluded from politics. The idea that public policies should not be influenced by religious beliefs is misguided. American foreign policy has encompassed religious discourse, including evangelical doctrine in order to make it more justifiable at home as well abroad, Critics argue that the American Christian Right was much more likely to influence American engagement in its foreign policy. However, engaging the Christian Right in broader foreign policy discussions needs to be seriously reexamined. On the assumption that the September 11 terror was considered sort of religious war against the American exceptionalism, the U.S. response to the terrorist attack tended to address more religious rhetoric and discourse. Inevitably or transiently, neoconservatism was overly mixed up with religious language, thus leading to the distortion that evangelicals, especially the Christian Right played a critical part in making American neoconservative policies. Christian evangelicals in the US are a very diverse group themselves rather than a monolithic organization. The relationship between Christian evangelicals and the support for neoconservative foreign policy is less likely to be evident.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (40)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0