지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.1
- 수록면
- 227 - 276 (50page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Darfur civil war in the Sudan erupted in April 2003 while
negotiations to end the north-south civil war were in the
process. In a short span of time, the number of deaths from the
Darfur civil war reached more than 200,000 people, and another
two million Darfurians have been displaced either inside or
outside of the Sudan. Not only were outsiders shocked by this,
but the Sudanese themselves were also startled by the sudden
eruption of another civil war in their remote western region.
Soon, Western media reported it as either 'ethnic cleansing' or
'genocide' and called it the worst humanitarian disaster in
recent time. The Darfur civil war is, however, the result of a
long period of conflict between the settled African and the
nomadic Arab tribes because of the desertification of the
northern region due to both manmade and natural causes. The
whole region experienced one of the worst famines in
1984-85. The conflict between the two groups has been
escalated since then. The conflict, however, has been managed
by the traditional moral order until the power struggle between
President Bashir and Hasan al-Turabi began in 1999. Although
the background of the Darfur civil war is a long story, the
actual civil war started in 2003 because general conditions for a
civil war were met at the time.
The conditions were, firstly, the lack of government abilities to
control the country; secondly, the political instabilities caused by
power struggle between the president and the leader of Sudanese
radical Islam; and finally, the suitability of surrounding areas of
Mt. Marra for the recruiting, training, and hiding for the rebels.
Therefore, the Darfur civil war is not unique. Rather, it is very
similar to the cause of a general civil war, like a volcano: A long
period of preparation and eruption when the conditions are met,
Civil wars typically ended with a decisive military victory for one
side. Concluding a civil war by power-sharing agreements has
been far less common. Negotiations on power-sharing are
common in the midst of civil wars, but they have usually failed
because civil wars cause combatants to be organized in a way
that produces mutually reinforcing fears and temptations. Also, in
order to end a civil war by power-sharing agreements, there
should be a consensus to live up to the agreements in both the
rebel groups and the government. The main rebel groups in
Darfur, the SLA and JEM, are organized by tribal bases, so not
only do they compete with one another, but they have many
sub-groups on each side. The Sudanese government also lost the
control of the Janjaweed, the government supported Arab
militias. As a result, it is very difficult to conclude the civil war
by a power-sharing mechanism. The power-sharing agreement
between the government and the SLA in 2006 was failed, and the
civil war has been continued. The international conference held
to end the civil war in October 2007 in Libya was not successful
because of the absence of many rebel leaders. Right now, both
parties are incapable to end the civil war by a decisive military
victory. The only way to end it is through power-sharing
agreements, but conditions for this are not given at present. As
a result, the Darfur civil war will be a protracted one.
The Darfur civil war in the Sudan erupted in April 2003 while negotiations to end the north-south civil war were in the process. In a short span of time, the number of deaths from the Darfur civil war reached more than 200,000 people, and another two million Darfurians have been displaced either inside or outside of the Sudan. Not only were outsiders shocked by this, but the Sudanese themselves were also startled by the sudden eruption of another civil war in their remote western region. Soon, Western media reported it as either 'ethnic cleansing' or 'genocide' and called it the worst humanitarian disaster in recent time. The Darfur civil war is, however, the result of a long period of conflict between the settled African and the nomadic Arab tribes because of the desertification of the northern region due to both manmade and natural causes. The whole region experienced one of the worst famines in 1984-85. The conflict between the two groups has been escalated since then. The conflict, however, has been managed by the traditional moral order until the power struggle between President Bashir and Hasan al-Turabi began in 1999. Although the background of the Darfur civil war is a long story, the actual civil war started in 2003 because general conditions for a civil war were met at the time. The conditions were, firstly, the lack of government abilities to control the country; secondly, the political instabilities caused by power struggle between the president and the leader of Sudanese radical Islam; and finally, the suitability of surrounding areas of Mt. Marra for the recruiting, training, and hiding for the rebels. Therefore, the Darfur civil war is not unique. Rather, it is very similar to the cause of a general civil war, like a volcano: A long period of preparation and eruption when the conditions are met, Civil wars typically ended with a decisive military victory for one side. Concluding a civil war by power-sharing agreements has been far less common. Negotiations on power-sharing are common in the midst of civil wars, but they have usually failed because civil wars cause combatants to be organized in a way that produces mutually reinforcing fears and temptations. Also, in order to end a civil war by power-sharing agreements, there should be a consensus to live up to the agreements in both the rebel groups and the government. The main rebel groups in Darfur, the SLA and JEM, are organized by tribal bases, so not only do they compete with one another, but they have many sub-groups on each side. The Sudanese government also lost the control of the Janjaweed, the government supported Arab militias. As a result, it is very difficult to conclude the civil war by a power-sharing mechanism. The power-sharing agreement between the government and the SLA in 2006 was failed, and the civil war has been continued. The international conference held to end the civil war in October 2007 in Libya was not successful because of the absence of many rebel leaders. Right now, both parties are incapable to end the civil war by a decisive military victory. The only way to end it is through power-sharing agreements, but conditions for this are not given at present. As a result, the Darfur civil war will be a protracted one.
The Darfur civil war in the Sudan erupted in April 2003 while negotiations to end the north-south civil war were in the process. In a short span of time, the number of deaths from the Darfur civil war reached more than 200,000 people, and another two million Darfurians have been displaced either inside or outside of the Sudan. Not only were outsiders shocked by this, but the Sudanese themselves were also startled by the sudden eruption of another civil war in their remote western region. Soon, Western media reported it as either 'ethnic cleansing' or 'genocide' and called it the worst humanitarian disaster in recent time. The Darfur civil war is, however, the result of a long period of conflict between the settled African and the nomadic Arab tribes because of the desertification of the northern region due to both manmade and natural causes. The whole region experienced one of the worst famines in 1984-85. The conflict between the two groups has been escalated since then. The conflict, however, has been managed by the traditional moral order until the power struggle between President Bashir and Hasan al-Turabi began in 1999. Although the background of the Darfur civil war is a long story, the actual civil war started in 2003 because general conditions for a civil war were met at the time. The conditions were, firstly, the lack of government abilities to control the country; secondly, the political instabilities caused by power struggle between the president and the leader of Sudanese radical Islam; and finally, the suitability of surrounding areas of Mt. Marra for the recruiting, training, and hiding for the rebels. Therefore, the Darfur civil war is not unique. Rather, it is very similar to the cause of a general civil war, like a volcano: A long period of preparation and eruption when the conditions are met, Civil wars typically ended with a decisive military victory for one side. Concluding a civil war by power-sharing agreements has been far less common. Negotiations on power-sharing are common in the midst of civil wars, but they have usually failed because civil wars cause combatants to be organized in a way that produces mutually reinforcing fears and temptations. Also, in order to end a civil war by power-sharing agreements, there should be a consensus to live up to the agreements in both the rebel groups and the government. The main rebel groups in Darfur, the SLA and JEM, are organized by tribal bases, so not only do they compete with one another, but they have many sub-groups on each side. The Sudanese government also lost the control of the Janjaweed, the government supported Arab militias. As a result, it is very difficult to conclude the civil war by a power-sharing mechanism. The power-sharing agreement between the government and the SLA in 2006 was failed, and the civil war has been continued. The international conference held to end the civil war in October 2007 in Libya was not successful because of the absence of many rebel leaders. Right now, both parties are incapable to end the civil war by a decisive military victory. The only way to end it is through power-sharing agreements, but conditions for this are not given at present. As a result, the Darfur civil war will be a protracted one.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (37)
참고문헌 신청
Bannon / 2003 / Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Options and Actions / The World Bank
Berdal / 2000 / Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars, Boulder, Lynne Rienner
Collier / 2005 / Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis / The World Bank
Cumings / 1981 / The Origins of the Korean War, Vol.1, Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes 1945-1947 / Princeton University Press.
Daly / 2007 / Darfur's Sorrow: A History of Destruction and Genocide / Cambridge University Press.
Berdal / 2000 / Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars, Boulder, Lynne Rienner
Collier / 2005 / Understanding Civil War: Evidence and Analysis / The World Bank
Cumings / 1981 / The Origins of the Korean War, Vol.1, Liberation and the Emergence of Separate Regimes 1945-1947 / Princeton University Press.
Daly / 2007 / Darfur's Sorrow: A History of Destruction and Genocide / Cambridge University Press.
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
내전에서의 희생자보호와 그 한계
법학논총
2014 .06
-
한국전쟁 전후 민간인학살과 20세기의 내전
아세아연구
2010 .12
-
Application of the Law of War in the Korean War
국제법학회논총
1990 .12
-
Mission Impossible? Negotiated Settlement, UN PKO, and Post-Civil War Democracy Building
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2017 .01
-
한국민법에 있어서 일본민법의 영향과 역사적 과제 - 서론적 고찰 -
법학논집
2016 .01
-
새로운 전쟁’으로서의 중동전쟁
아세아연구
2013 .12
-
한국전쟁과 내전 : 세 가지 내전 개념의 구분
한국정치학회보
2013 .12
-
민법의 제정과정을 통해 살펴 본 민법개정 제안
강원법학
2012 .02
-
클라우제비츠의 전쟁이론과 평화이론
군사학연구
2004 .01
-
우리 民事訴訟法의 沿革에 관하여
고려법학
2009 .01
-
‘국민의 의지’가 전쟁의 결과에 미친 영향 : 제1차 세계대전시 영국과 독일 사례를 중심으로
군사
2013 .09
-
수단 다르프르(Darfur)내란의 원인규명에 관한 고찰
한국국제정치학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2006 .12
-
민법의 제정 과정에 대한 입법평가
법과정책
2018 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0