메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제38권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
93 - 108 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Though Indictment Modification System is an element of adversary system, Indictment ModificationRequirement System is an element of inquisitional system prepared to acknowledge authoritative intervention ofthe court in order to supplement Indictment Modification System. To discuss the legal nature of the system, itshould be decided by Indictment Modification Requirement System itself, and unlike existing theories orprecedents, Indictment Modification Requirement should be considered as a right and duty of the court at thesame time through reviewing revision object of the Criminal Procedure Law which introduced the system, andcomparing the regulations of Japanese Criminal Procedure Law. In the view of Indictment Modification Requirement System as a right and duty of the court, if the courtrequired for modification of an indictment within the recognition range of criminal fact and identity, therequired criminal fact becomes the substantive subject of judgment, and the defense right of the accused isconsidered to be exercised; therefore, considering if there is a substantive disadvantage or not in exercisingdefense right of the accused, it is possible for the court to make a decision on the criminal fact that requiredmodification of indictment. In respect of adversary system, as it is true that indictment modification requirement of court is an exceptionof adversary system, it is necessary to be circumspect in indictment modification requirement of court respectingthe chance of application for indictment modification of prosecutor during the trial examination; however, todeclare innocent on the criminal fact in a situation of no application for indictment modification, even if thereis admissible criminal fact, with a passive demeanor that regards indictment modification requirement asdiscretion of court, gives the accused an unfair profit, and results in against finding of substantial truth. Thus, it is expected to contribute the requirement system to perform appropriate role in accordance with thepurpose of criminal suit, which is finding substantial truth according to reasonable procedure by reviewing thelegal nature and effect of Indictment Modification Requirement System of court critically.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0