메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제33권 제1호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
205 - 233 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Due to globalization of economy, competition law offenses in a country might discourage the welfare of consumers in other countries and cause market disturbance. Thus each country has been putting every efforts to regulate this if any enterprises, in spite of belonging to other countries, influence on their own countries. What requested for that is to develop the application theory of competition law and consolidation of relevant regulations. The main theories to apply their country's competition law to the one of other countries are Effect Doctrine, Economic Single Unit Doctrine and Place of Implementation Theory. In case of the United States, even though there was a jurisdictional rule of reason through Interest balancing approach in the past, it has consistently applied its own Sherman Act to other countries in accordance with Effect Doctrine. And the related legislative system also has been revised or legislated to support this. In case of Europe, EU-Commission has been driving European competition policy under Effect Doctrine, but the Court of Justice of the European Communities has been applying competition law with Economic Single Unit Doctrine and Place of Implementation Theory. Though the Court of First Instance employed Effect Doctrine in the case of Gancor judgement, the Court of Justice of the European Communities still do not admit Effect Doctrine explicitly. In case of Korea, it didn't make a huge improvement regarding extraterritorial Application of competition law in the past. From the previous cases of black-lead electrode and vitamin, however, it came to have much interest in extraterritorial application of its competition law. The black-lead electrode case mentioned above has a great meaning in terms of extraterritorial application of Korea's competition law. In this case, Korea Fair Trade Commission put its focus based on Effects Doctrine and established provisions on extraterritorial application of The Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act with this as a momentum. Extraterritorial application of competition law is the area that there is a sharp conflict of interests between nations on this point, so there is no unified international standards. Even though there have been much efforts on this, good results have not been produced because of conflict of interests. In recent times, accordingly, cooperative relations regarding extraterritorial application each other have been established by means of bilateral cooperation agreement or bilateral trade agreement including FTA. Integration of global economy seems to be more accelerated in the near future and there would be many problems emerged from extraterritorial application of competition law as business markets are expanded. In this respect, more in-depth discussion on this matter has to be done.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0