메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제36권 제1호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
332 - 348 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper aims to review the theory and practice of detention in criminal procedure and to suggest amendment of criminal procedure in Korea. I review critically the situation of theoretical debates on the detention in general and the real state of its application and seeks for where the detention system should head in the future. In short, the main proposals are as follows:First, the imprisonment-criteria, which functions as the factual reason for detention in practice, should not be applied any more. The application of imprisonment-criteria in detention decision by judges is against the principle of innocence assumption and the purpose of the detention system. Second, the degree of crime suspicion as basic cause of detention should be interpreted differently from that of arrest. The degree of crime suspicion in arrest is lower that of detention. Third, the seriousness of crime should not be applied as independent detention reason, because the goal of detention in criminal procedure is securement of future procedure proceeding, not the punishment of defendant. The risk of recidivism and danger of harm to others also should not be applied as independent detention standards. Fourth, the detention warrant screening by judges and bail system should be promoted in practice aggressively to enhance the principle of non-detention in criminal procedure and to protect the rights of the accused. Finally, immediate complaint to the decision of judges on arrest warrant should be allowed to accumulate the judiciary review on the arrest decisions. In the end, the principles of non-detention in investigation and innocence assumption can be enhanced by mutual understanding and mutual cooperation between judges and prosecutors more effectively.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (37)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0