메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서강대학교 신학연구소 신학과 철학 신학과 철학 제19호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
79 - 121 (43page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article argues that Rousseau’s account of the source of evil in his Confessions was in fact a reply to Augustine’s Confessions. By taking Confessions as the title of his autobiography, it believes, Rousseau wanted his readers to relate his book to Augustine’s. There are thematic and structural similarities in two Confessions. And the main themes of both Confessions are problem of evil and human salvation. This article, therefore, reads very closely both Confessions together in this comparative perspective, especially some key accounts of the source of evil in two Confessions. It is only this detailed exegetical consideration of both texts in comparison that leads us to clear and full understanding that Rousseau intended his secular account of the problem of evil to be a response to Augustine’s account, especially to Augustine’s doctrine of original sin. Rousseau turned around the whole discussion of the source of evil from an ontological and theological discourse to a philosophical and social discourse, so as to pave the way to an ethics that is based upon human autonomy instead of theistic transcendence. Rousseau’s secular account of problem of evil, therefore, took the human salvation away from God, and attributed it to the human heart itself.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0