메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제23호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
121 - 151 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Report on admissibility of evidence is relation to admissibility of evidence in criminal procedure. There are two sorts report on admissibility of evidence. The article 311 and 312.(6) the code of criminal procedure is different from the main body in drawing up. The article 311 the code of criminal procedure prepared by a court of justice. The article 312.(6) the code of criminal procedure prepared by investigation agency. Both parties in admissibility of evidence is discrepancy in legalistic ability. Report on admissibility of evidence in court of justice accept admissibility of evidence automatically. But report on admissibility of evidence in investigation agency accept after adequacy of uniform requirements. Adequacy of uniform requirements is a strict rule. The effect of the strict controls was serviceable in criminal procedure to what was expected. Report on admissibility of evidence by due process of law and conforming to the usage is possible. In addition, What it truly in establishing accept admissibility of evidence. And then, There are so many issues surrounding that both site investigation report and report on admissibility of evidence are equivalent in character. There is same essence between the two. site investigation report. Thus, we must apply to the article 312.(6) the code of criminal procedure. It is demanding that all site investigation report should be take an objective view. If It is to follow the rules of poor treatment, admissibility of evidence will be disappear into thin air.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0