메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제20호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
87 - 135 (49page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The restitution of exceed gains from reconstruction was introduced to prevent the privatization of exceed gains or unearned income and ultimately to stabilize housing prices. However, there would be room for unconstitutionality when we consider restriction of property rights, difficulties of a fair and accurate measurement of property liable for taxation, lack of appropriate regulations in case of land price declines, double taxation, retroactive legislation, violation of the principle of equality, violation of the principle of excessive prohibition. This system was created in the era of real estate boom and there was no social consensus during the process of creating the system. This system, compared to another restitution system of development gains, restricts property rights quite excessively. Moreover, there were not enough legislative considerations of subjects who have property rights and freedom of the reconstruction. Considering shrinking real estate market of nowadays and the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we can see that the reconstruction of apartments is getting more and more difficult. However in the future the reconstruction of apartments should not have to be suppressed, but rather to be supported, especially considering that apartments in the 1st New City and other neighboring area are presently more than 20 years old and their building coverage and floor area ratio are very high. So we will have to consider introducing policies to encourage the reconstruction of apartments. Through the analysis of the status and problems of restitution development gains including the restitution of exceed gains from the reconstruction of apartments, we will be able to discuss ways to improve the system. First, we must formulate national consensus that land or housing benefit or unearned income generated from any developments or redevelopments should be restituted, complying with the principle of social state and the public concept of land. Second, we need to restitute exceed gains originated from all development projects without exception and modify our legal system necessary for restitution of exceed gains from all development projects not only for the development areas but also for the neighborhood of the development areas.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0