부의 결정기준으로서 부자관계설정의사의 기능 및 한계

김상헌

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 김상헌

저널정보: 건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제27호

발행연도: 2014.1

수록면: 229 - 262 (34page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

.In case of our country, it’s difficult to find the precedence of giving clear judgment of the decision standard of paternity; nevertheless, looking into how the legal principle evaluates the volitional element like the intention of becoming a father, or a father’s consent when the precedent decides on paternity will be a reference in arranging the decision standard of paternity consequent on test-tube reproduction; in this context, consideration of this issue will be a meaningful research. Accordingly, this paper looked into how a father’s volitional element equal to the existence or non-existence of the intention of setting up a father-child relationship works on deciding on paternity consequent on artificial insemination, and what is the limit to the function of a father’s volitional element through the representative precedents. In case of an artificial insemination donor(hereinafter, “AID”), especially in a father-son relationship, there follows the concern that a new baby might be in an unsafe position depending on a husband’s consent to artificial insemination; therefore, in case a couple, who consented to getting sperm donation first, has a baby using sperm donation, the enactment of the law providing that the relevant husband cannot deny paternity of the baby is the task that should be preceded for the baby’s welfare though it is not related genetically; nevertheless, this paper puts emphasis on the fact it’s possible to fully surmount this problem only if the legal system can fully think of the intention of establishing a father-child relationship, which is a volitional element of paternity, as an important judgment factor in father-child formation even if following the present family law principle. Nevertheless, in case such an intention of father-child establishment appears in an inequitable form, or in case a man in a specific relationship takes a method of denying his intention of becoming paternity even while consenting to the birth of a baby consequent on donation of his own sperm, it becomes the form restricted in the volitional element, which is the very limit in a volitional element.

In case of our country, it’s difficult to find the precedence of giving clear judgment of the decision standard of paternity; nevertheless, looking into how the legal principle evaluates the volitional element like the intention of becoming a father, or a father’s consent when the precedent decides on paternity will be a reference in arranging the decision standard of paternity consequent on test-tube reproduction; in this context, consideration of this issue will be a meaningful research. Accordingly, this paper looked into how a father’s volitional element equal to the existence or non-existence of the intention of setting up a father-child relationship works on deciding on paternity consequent on artificial insemination, and what is the limit to the function of a father’s volitional element through the representative precedents. In case of an artificial insemination donor(hereinafter, “AID”), especially in a father-son relationship, there follows the concern that a new baby might be in an unsafe position depending on a husband’s consent to artificial insemination; therefore, in case a couple, who consented to getting sperm donation first, has a baby using sperm donation, the enactment of the law providing that the relevant husband cannot deny paternity of the baby is the task that should be preceded for the baby’s welfare though it is not related genetically; nevertheless, this paper puts emphasis on the fact it’s possible to fully surmount this problem only if the legal system can fully think of the intention of establishing a father-child relationship, which is a volitional element of paternity, as an important judgment factor in father-child formation even if following the present family law principle. Nevertheless, in case such an intention of father-child establishment appears in an inequitable form, or in case a man in a specific relationship takes a method of denying his intention of becoming paternity even while consenting to the birth of a baby consequent on donation of his own sperm, it becomes the form restricted in the volitional element, which is the very limit in a volitional element.

#보조생식기술 #친생추정 #부의 결정기준 #부자관계설정의사 #의지적 요소 #assisted reproductive technology #presumption of paternity #judgment of the decision standard of paternity #intention of setting up father-child relationship #volitional element

참고문헌 (38)

참고문헌 신청

/ 2005 / 주석 민법(친족 2) / 한국사법행정학회

Dagmar Coester-Waltjen / 1986 / Die kunstliche Befruchtung beim Menschen -Zulassigkeit und zivilrechtliche Folgen, Gutachten B zum 56. Deutschen Juristentag Berlin 1986 / C. H. Beck

Daniel gruenbaum / 2012 / Foreign Surrogate Motherhood: mater semper certa erat / American journal of comparative law 60 : 475 ~ 506

Elizabeth L.Gibson / 1992 / Artificial Insemination by Doner: Information, Communication and Regulation / Journal of Family Law 30 : 1 ~ 44

Marcelo de alcantara / 2010 / Surrogacy in Japan: Legal Implications for Parentage and Citizenship / Family court review 48 : 417 ~ 430

이 논문의 저자 정보

김상헌

소속기관 건국대학교 법학연구소

주요연구분야 사회과학 > 법학

논문수 1 이용수 5

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (38)

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)