메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제26호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
463 - 494 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Establishing an evaluation model of legislative activities and developing accurate evaluation indicator have a significant meaning in representative democracy as it lays out ground work to ensure its accountability. Accordingly, this paper aims to go beyond the previous evaluation system which mainly focuses on developing quantitative and qualitative indicators and provides a new model for ensuring retrospective accountability in democratic political process. In furtherance of this approach, this paper analyzes different types of legislative evaluation agents, standards and methods of the current evaluation system and relevant problems. Moreover,it proposes to replace the standard approach of fidelity and professionalism which is instrumental and indirect indicators, with goal-oriented indicators of parliamentary democracy. Major evaluation indicators presented in this paper are representativeness, responsiveness and productivity. This paper also specifies detailed evaluation criteria. In order to promote fairness in evaluation, this paper also points out that more effort is needed from evaluation agent. As qualitative evaluation requires professionalism, this paper introduces ways to invite not only the public, but also experts and juries to evaluate Members legislative activities. As evaluation system is important to both voters and their representatives implementing reasonable and affordable evaluation system is essential to make it sustainable.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (36)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0