지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper deals with the evaluation of individual Assemblyman. For the effective evaluation, such questions are to be answered as follows: who can evaluate, what criteria should be used, what can be devised as assessing tools, and so on. Therefore, it is very important to provide objective criteria,accurate judgments, fair procedures, strict and obvious rewards and sanctions. The aim of the evaluation is to encourage Assemblyman to do his/her best for excellent accomplishment as a representative, instead of seeking the partisan interests. The areas of the evaluation should include a wide range of roles and duties of Assemblyman under the Constitution and laws. Ultimately, a political culture should be cultivated that the results of the evaluation can make an impact to re-election of Assemblyman, which requires the sustained attention and effort of the media and civil society.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (36)
참고문헌 신청
/ / http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation
Bruce E. Cain / 1987 / The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence / Harvard University Press
Glenn R. Parker / 1979 / Why Do Americans Love Their Congressmen So Much More Than Their Congress? / Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 (1) : 53 ~ 61
Kit Mason / / The Congressional Evaluation Project, 2004
Morris P. Fiorina / 1981 / Retrospective Voting in American National Elections / Yale Univ. Press
Glenn R. Parker / 1979 / Why Do Americans Love Their Congressmen So Much More Than Their Congress? / Legislative Studies Quarterly 4 (1) : 53 ~ 61
Kit Mason / / The Congressional Evaluation Project, 2004
Morris P. Fiorina / 1981 / Retrospective Voting in American National Elections / Yale Univ. Press
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0