지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper attempts to analyse Korean court’s case opinion in terms of its function, role, and significance in the legal system based on the assumption that the case opinion could play significant role for the enhancement of judicial democracy and the institutional development of judiciary. This paper suggests that court’s case opinion should be written in the way which allows any third party could review and verify the appropriateness of the decision. For this purpose, a case opinion must provide the legal standard as an interpretation of the applicable law which it chooses and its application to the facts of the case to show how it reaches the decision.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (23)
참고문헌 신청
Chad M. Oldfather / 2008 / Writing, Cognition, and the Nature of the Judicial Function / Georgetown Law Journal : 1283 ~ 1345
Daniel Farber / 2006 / The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents / Minnesota Law Review : 1173 ~ 1203
Earl M. Maltz / 2000 / The Function of Supreme Court Opinions / Houston Law Review (Winter) : 1395 ~ 1420
Elizabeth Ahlgren Francis / 1999 / The Elements of Ordered Opinion Writing / Judges’ Journal (Spring) : 8 ~ 12
Frederick Schauer / 1987 / Precedent / Stanford Law Review : 571 ~ 605
Daniel Farber / 2006 / The Rule of Law and the Law of Precedents / Minnesota Law Review : 1173 ~ 1203
Earl M. Maltz / 2000 / The Function of Supreme Court Opinions / Houston Law Review (Winter) : 1395 ~ 1420
Elizabeth Ahlgren Francis / 1999 / The Elements of Ordered Opinion Writing / Judges’ Journal (Spring) : 8 ~ 12
Frederick Schauer / 1987 / Precedent / Stanford Law Review : 571 ~ 605
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0