메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울대학교 인지과학연구소 Journal of Cognitive Science Journal of Cognitive Science 제12권 제3호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
233 - 259 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Natural language production requires a grammar and a lexicon. We will deal here only with the latter, trying to enhance an existing electronic resource to allow for search via navigation in a huge associative network. The structure and the process are somehow akin to the mental lexicon (ml). We have a network composed of nodes (mainly words) and links (mainly associations). Search, or rather, navigation consist in entering the network at some point by providing a query —(usually a word, somehow related to the target word)—and following the links to get from the source word (Sw) to the target word (Tw),the goal. While our lexical graphs are different from the multilayered networks of the human brain (weight, decomposition, automaticity), functionally speaking there are some important similarities between the two, in particular with respect to navigation. While spreading activation is generally automatic and outside of the user’s control, its counterpart (navigation) is deliberate and in slow motion. Our primary focus in this paper will be on the structure of the lexicon and its indexing scheme. These two points have often been overlooked,yet they are crucial, as they determine the extent to which users, — (hence, not only readers, but also authors) — can find the word they are looking for. While researchers of the natural language generation (nlg)-community have devoted a lot of work to lexicalization (i.e. the mapping of meanings to forms),lexical access has never received any attention at all. Lexicalization is generally considered to be only a choice problem, the assumption being, that data that is stored can also be accessed. While this may hold for machines, it certainly does not apply for people, at least not always, as is well attested via the ‘tip-of-thetongue’problem (Brown and McNeill, 1966). Yet, even machines may ‘experience’access problems. We will illustrate this last point via a small experiment,showing how a well known lexical resource (WordNet) does not always reveal information (words) it contains. In the remainder we will then show how a lexicon should be organized to allow language producers (speakers/writers) to find quickly and naturally what they are looking for, in our case, the target word.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0